Wednesday, March 11, 2009

What Kills Us this Week!

We're back! Hong Kong has put aside the recent strange stoic maturity, born of the financial crisis, to again indulge in a first-rate panic.

What's happened is that a local drug company - a real one, not the more-usual bogus-medicine factory - has accidentally mixed a toxic fungus into a batch of their leukemia drugs and, since leukemia-folk have no immune systems and thus can't fight toxic fungi, all the patients died.

Hong Kong is naturally very cross about this, but they're demanding all 39 drugs manufactured by this company be recalled and tested, and no matter what the result, all be removed from the marketplace. And maybe, since China is coming over all creepy and insidious again, they'll even demand we put the screwing-up CEOs to death, like wot they do!

Mind you, it would be really interesting to find out HOW toxic fungus got into the medicine batch? I can see no logical scenario where that could happen - unless it involved employees with advanced Alzheimers and keys to a local poisons silo! Mmmm, I think I'll be following this Public Inquiry with great interest and let you know too.

But since people have died I don't want to laugh about this, so I'm going to have to go elsewhere to find this week's Threatdown.

Three possibilities:

1) Over in Macau, Hong Kong people (university professors, thinkers, journalists etc) are being turned away at Macau's entry points ... which appears to point at China finally activating Article 23.

If so, it's a real worry. You no doubt know all about "The Basic Law" and "One Country: Two Systems" which China signed with Britain and Portugal before our respective Handovers. What this means is that, although we are part of China, we are both SARS and thus China can do nothing in either country for 50 years.

However, back in 2003, China went all sneaky and sinister and tried to introduce another Article into our Basic Law. This is Article 23 and a more sinister document would be hard to find. I won't go into what it's about here, because, when I first read it, I bored everyone to tears with my furious rants about what China could get away with under this piece of legislation. Read it yourself sometime and tremble in fear at the ramifications!

Well, HK read it and you will recall that when China tried to bring Article 23 into Hong Kong, 500,000 people took to the streets in protest and so China immediately took it off the table. However, Macau wasn't so clever and, during China's second swoop, let it pass into Law ... and then nothing happened for three years so we all forgot how frightening it is ... and now that China is suddenly coming over all sinister and creepy again - WHY??? And Prince Charles needs to hear about this! From something I overheard, I think he's the one who stopped its bullying last time, back in 2004, as he promised during his Handover Speech! - it appears they've now shown their hand by starting to use Article 23 the way it was always intended.

Anyway, Long Hair and Pro-Democracy Cohorts plan a mass-crossing to Macau to see if they too get turned away, and if so, questions have to be asked. And hopefully the entire world will be asking along with us because it's going to take a concerted effort to get Beijing to back off again!

Do take an interest because, well, China can be a lovely country when it pulls its head back in, and it looks like it needs to be told to back off again! Oh, and Macau needs to revoke Article 23 too, so how about everyone doing something about that as well?

2) The truly insane spin-doctoring going on regarding these "50 Years in Tibet" celebrations, with China saying self-congratulatory stuff like "Since we took over, the population has doubled" and Tibetans saying "That's because you massacred so many of us and brought in your own citizens to populate our land." Lots and lots of that sort of stuff which would be hilarious if it wasn't just so desperately sad.

Actually, when you look at what's happening in Tibet and Mongolia, and if you factor in Article 23, I think we should all be thinking "Lebenstraum!!!" and getting kinda a bit more than a little concerned.

3) The gorgeous meeting they're having up in Beijing at the moment to reorganise their political system in order "to make it more democratic". Do read what's coming out because it's a non-stop giggle. Like, although they are "desiring to move towards Democracy", they've forbidden any talk of "a multi-party system", "having an Opposition to the Communist Party", and absolutely off the agenda, and death to any one who mentions it, is "any talk of separation of the powers".

Since, as we all know, the cornerstones of Democracy are "Multiple Parties", "A Strong Opposition" and "Separation of the Powers", if you don't have those, isn't it obvious that you simply don't have a Democracy. China soooo doesn't get it!

Do you love it?

So those are the big stories happening around here. And which one should be this week's choice?

Threatdown

Article 23.
Nothing else happening here is
more seriously in need of panic!



Update: Regarding the mass-crossing to Macau on the weekend to challenge the ruling, twenty eight Pro-Democracy activists were allowed into the SAR, and five, including Long Hair, were barred. The ones allowed in then all went to a Portuguese/Macanese seafood restaurant for a nice meal. Dangerous folk, these Pro-Democracy activists!

Abandoned Places

Am completely loving this website. Please drop by to see the strange beauty of the abandoned area around Chenobyl.

http://community.livejournal.com/abandonedplaces/1651741.html

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Sunday in Hong Kong

Mooching around Hong Kong yesterday, at Tsim Sha Tsui, snapping away, trying to capture the quintessential HK; the single image that says "This is Hong Kong" more than any other. Here are some of my favourite contenders:
The Harbour and Pollution.

Star Ferry, IFC Tower and Pollution.

Tropical highrise.



Buskers from The Celtic Society.

Chinglish Signs.


Giggling girls with
higher degrees and fluffy toys.

Burberry.
Hong Kong's very own tartan.

"We saved the clock tower"
Hong Kong fights back
against developers!


Yin-Yang and pollution.

Do any of these say "Hong Kong" to you too? And can you suggest something MORE HK than these?

Advice from a Friend #2

A Literature Major friend sent me a list of 100 books BBC
thinks everyone should read. I was telling Emue, also a
Literature Major, about it and she wants to see the list
to count off how many she's read. This therefore is really
for Emue, but you may like to count them off as well.


The BBC believes most people will have only read 6 of the
100 books here.
How do your reading habits stack up?
BBC 100 BooksShare


1 Pride and Prejudice - Jane Austen- X
2 The Lord of the Rings - JRR Tolkien - (trilogy)
3 Jane Eyre - Charlotte Bronte - X
4 Harry Potter series - JK Rowling -(yes whole series) X
5 To Kill a Mockingbird - Harper Lee - X
6 The Bible - X
7 Wuthering Heights - Emily Bronte - X
8 Nineteen Eighty Four - George Orwell - X
9 His Dark Materials - Philip Pullman –
10 Great Expectations - Charles Dickens – X
11 Little Women - Louisa M Alcott – X
12 Tess of the D’Urbervilles - Thomas Hardy - X
13 Catch 22 - Joseph Heller – x
14 Complete Works of Shakespeare – not even close.
15 Rebecca - Daphne Du Maurier - x
16 The Hobbit - JRR Tolkien - X
17 Birdsong - Sebastian Faulk -
18 Catcher in the Rye - JD Salinger - X
19 The Time Traveller’s Wife - Audrey Niffenegger -
20 Middlemarch - George Eliot - X
21 Gone With The Wind - Margaret Mitchell - X
22 The Great Gatsby - F Scott Fitzgerald - X
23 Bleak House - Charles Dickens - X
24 War and Peace - Leo Tolstoy -
25 The Hitch Hiker’s Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams - X (all four)
26 Brideshead Revisited - Evelyn Waugh - X
27 Crime and Punishment - Fyodor Dostoyevsky-
28 Grapes of Wrath - John Steinbeck - X
29 Alice in Wonderland - Lewis Carroll – x
30 The Wind in the Willows - Kenneth Grahame - X
31 Anna Karenina - Leo Tolstoy - X
32 David Copperfield - Charles Dickens - X
33 Chronicles of Narnia - CS Lewis -
34 Emma - Jane Austen - X
35 Persuasion - Jane Austen - X
36 The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe - CS Lewis - X
37 The Kite Runner - Khaled Hosseini - X
38 Captain Corelli’s Mandolin - Louis De Bernieres -
39 Memoirs of a Geisha - Arthur Golden -X
40 Winnie the Pooh - AA Milne – X
41 Animal Farm - George Orwell - X
42 The Da Vinci Code - Dan Brown – X
43 One Hundred Years of Solitude - Gabriel Garcia Marquez - X
44 A Prayer for Owen Meany - John Irving -
45 The Woman in White - Wilkie Collins - X
46 Anne of Green Gables - LM Montgomery - X
47 Far From The Madding Crowd - Thomas Hardy - X
48 The Handmaid’s Tale - Margaret Atwood -
49 Lord of the Flies - William Golding - X
50 Atonement - Ian McEwan -
51 Life of Pi - Yann Martel -
52 Dune - Frank Herbert -
53 Cold Comfort Farm - Stella Gibbons -
54 Sense and Sensibility - Jane Austen - X
55 A Suitable Boy - Vikram Seth -
56 The Shadow of the Wind - Carlos Ruiz Zafon -
57 A Tale Of Two Cities - Charles Dickens - X
58 Brave New World - Aldous Huxley- X
59 The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time - Mark Haddon -
60 Love In The Time Of Cholera - Gabriel Garcia Marquez -
61 Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck - X
62 Lolita - Vladimir Nabokov - X
63 The Secret History - Donna Tartt -
64 The Lovely Bones - Alice Sebold -
65 Count of Monte Cristo - Alexandre Dumas - X
66 On The Road - Jack Kerouac - X
67 Jude the Obscure - Thomas Hardy - X
68 Bridget Jones’s Diary - Helen Fielding – X
69 Midnight’s Children - Salman Rushdie -
70 Moby Dick - Herman Melville - X
71 Oliver Twist - Charles Dickens - X
72 Dracula - Bram Stoker - X
73 The Secret Garden - Frances Hodgson Burnett - X
74 Notes From A Small Island - Bill Bryson - X
75 Ulysses - James Joyce - (???????)
76 The Inferno - Dante - X
77 Swallows and Amazons - Arthur Ransome -
78 Germinal - Emile Zola - X
79 Vanity Fair - William Makepeace Thackeray – X
80 Possession - AS Byatt - X
81 A Christmas Carol - Charles Dickens - X
82 Cloud Atlas - David Mitchell -
83 The Color Purple - Alice Walker- X
84 The Remains of the Day - Kazuo Ishiguro -
85 Madame Bovary - Gustave Flaubert - X
86 A Fine Balance - Rohinton Mistry -
87 Charlotte’s Web - EB White - X
88 The Five People You Meet In Heaven - Mitch Albom -
89 Adventures of Sherlock Holmes - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle - X
90 The Faraway Tree Collection - Enid Blyton -
91 Heart of Darkness - Joseph Conrad - X
92 The Little Prince - Antoine De Saint-Exupery - X
93 The Wasp Factory - Iain Banks -
94 Watership Down - Richard Adams - X
95 A Confederacy of Dunces - John Kennedy Toole-
96 A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute - X
97 The Three Musketeers - Alexandre Dumas - X
98 Hamlet - William Shakespeare - X
99 Charlie and the Chocolate Factoy - Roald Dahl -
100 Les Miserables - Victor Hugo –


So, how did you do? You can see by the crosses I've read 67
of them, but that's because I'm a sad nerd from way-back. I've
also started a further five only found them unreadable. (I
will always contend no one on the planet has ever actually
finished James Joyce's "Ulysses".) And some of them I only
read because ... well, when you do a double major in
Literature and History, books like that ghastly "Germinal" -
which I contend
no one has EVER read for pleasure - those
sadistic torturing BEASTS force you to read them!!!.

Advice from a Friend #1

I have absolutely no idea if this is true but a friend sent it to me and I'm passing it on for you to make your own decision.


If you should ever be forced by a robber to withdraw money from an ATM machine, you can notify the police by entering your PIN # in reverse. For example, if your pin number is 1234, then you would put in 4321. The ATM system recognizes that your PIN number is backwards from the ATM card you placed in the machine.

The machine will still give you the money you requested, but unknown to the robber, the police will be immediately dispatched to the location. This information was recently broadcasted on CTV by Crime Stoppers however it is seldom used because people just don't know about it.